TRUCK TALK

Why Truck Accidents Are Increasing

Jon hollan speaking in a truck talk episode on why truck accidents are increasing
Truck Talk with Jon Hollan, Managing Partner, Lexington. Episode runs 3:23.

There are more large trucks on American roads than ever, and the crashes involving them have trended upward for years. The reasons are not mysterious. They come down to freight volume, driver experience, scheduling pressure, distraction, and the simple physics of mixing heavy vehicles with passenger cars. No single cause explains the rise; it is several pressures pushing in the same direction at once. In this Truck Talk segment, Jon Hollan walks through the forces pushing truck crashes higher, and what each one means for a person hurt when a commercial vehicle gets it wrong.

Freight Demand

The most basic driver of the trend is volume. The amount of freight moving by truck has grown with the economy and with the shift to online shopping, which put more packages on more vehicles moving to more doorsteps. More trucks covering more miles means more exposure, and more exposure means more crashes even if nothing else changes.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration compiles large-truck and bus crash data, and the long-run picture shows a heavy and growing commercial presence on the highway. Trucks now compete for road space with passenger cars on interstates that were not built for today’s traffic levels, and the densest corridors see the most conflict. The miles driven by large trucks have climbed over the long term, and more miles is the single clearest predictor of more crashes.

Online retail changed both the shape and size of the freight network. Goods that once moved in bulk to stores now move in smaller loads to warehouses and then to homes, multiplying the number of vehicles and trips. Every link in that chain, the long-haul rig, the regional truck, the local van, adds vehicles to the road.

Kentucky feels this acutely. With I-75, I-64, I-65, and I-71 crossing the state, Kentucky carries national freight in every direction, and the trucks rolling through are part of a network that does not slow down. A driver hauling a load from one coast to the other may pass through Kentucky in the middle of a long, tiring run, on roads he does not know well, which is exactly the setup the safety rules try to manage. The growth in volume is the backdrop against which every other factor plays out. A road carrying more trucks is a road where the next several problems, fatigue, distraction, inexperience, have more chances to cause harm.

Driver Shortage

The industry has struggled for years to keep enough qualified drivers behind the wheel, and the way carriers respond to that shortage affects safety directly. Turnover at large carriers is high, which means a steady churn of newer drivers learning on the job. Experience matters enormously in a vehicle that can take the length of a football field to stop from highway speed, and a fleet staffed by less-experienced drivers carries more risk. Judging gaps, reading traffic, and handling a heavy load in bad conditions are skills that come with time behind the wheel. A driver in his first year handling a loaded trailer in heavy traffic, bad weather, or a tight work zone is operating at the edge of his experience, and small misjudgments at that level become crashes.

The pressure to fill seats can push carriers to lower their hiring standards. A company short on drivers may overlook a spotty driving record, rush a new hire through training, or keep a marginal driver it should have let go. A company that skips a careful background check or rushes training to put a body in a seat trades safety for capacity. Those choices show up later in a crash, and they show up in the driver qualification file that 49 CFR 391.51 requires carriers to keep.

When a crash traces back to a driver who never should have been hired or retained, the case reaches past the driver to the carrier’s hiring and supervision decisions. The shortage does not excuse those decisions; it explains why some carriers made them, and the records show whether a company cut corners to keep its trucks moving. A carrier’s safety record, including its inspection and crash history, is public and tells part of that story before a single document is requested.

Schedule Pressure

Trucking runs on deadlines, and tight ones push drivers toward unsafe choices. Just-in-time delivery, same-day shipping promises, and detention time at loading docks all squeeze the hours a driver has to cover a route legally. When the schedule and the speed limit conflict, the schedule too often wins.

Federal hours-of-service rules in FMCSA Part 395 exist precisely to keep that pressure from putting exhausted drivers on the road. They cap driving time and require rest, and electronic logging devices now make the limits enforceable. But a carrier that builds a route only achievable by speeding or skipping a break has created the conditions for a crash, whatever the rulebook says. Detention time, the unpaid hours a driver spends waiting to load or unload, eats into the legal driving window and tempts a driver to make up the lost time on the road.

That pressure leaves a paper trail. Dispatch messages, delivery windows, electronic logs, and toll and fuel records can together show a driver who was racing the clock, with the timestamps lining up into a picture of a shift run too hard. When a crash follows, those records connect the carrier’s scheduling to the driver’s conduct, which is what turns a single mistake into a company-level failure. A driver who chose to speed bears responsibility, but a company that made speeding the only way to keep the job bears it too, and the schedule records show which it was.

Distraction

Distraction has grown as a crash factor for every driver, and truckers are no exception. Phones, dispatch tablets, navigation, and onboard systems all compete for a driver’s attention, and at highway speed a few seconds of eyes off the road covers a long distance. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration identifies distracted driving as a persistent and serious cause of crashes nationwide.

Federal rules restrict commercial drivers from texting and from hand-held phone use while driving, recognizing that a distracted trucker is a special hazard given the size of the vehicle. A driver who was on a phone or a tablet when a crash happened violated a specific rule, and phone records, dispatch logs, and driver-facing camera footage can establish what he was doing in the moments before impact. Even a hands-free distraction, a navigation prompt or a dispatch alert, can pull a driver’s focus at the worst moment.

Onboard cameras have made distraction easier to prove than it once was. A driver-facing camera shows whether the driver was looking at the road, and paired with the engine data, it can turn a question about attention into a documented answer. The footage rarely lies, and it has resolved many cases where a driver’s account did not match what the camera recorded. That evidence, like all of it, has to be preserved before the system overwrites. The same short overwrite cycles that protect a carrier from frivolous claims can erase the proof an injured person needs, which is why the preservation demand goes out immediately.

Heavier Traffic

The roads themselves are more crowded, and congestion creates crashes. More vehicles in the same space means more merging, more sudden braking, and more chances for a heavy truck to find itself with nowhere to go. Stop-and-go traffic is especially hard on trucks, which need far more stopping distance than the cars around them. A truck that cannot see far enough ahead in dense traffic, or that is following too close to react, has little chance to avoid the car that brakes suddenly in front of it.

Infrastructure has not kept pace with the growth in traffic. Aging interstates, frequent work zones, and interchanges designed for lighter volumes all add friction. Roadwork meant to expand capacity ironically creates its own crash risk while it is underway, narrowing lanes and shifting traffic exactly where trucks need the most room. When a truck meets a sudden slowdown on a crowded road, the margin for error is thin, and a following-distance lapse that a car might absorb becomes a serious crash behind a loaded trailer.

Congestion also breeds aggressive driving. Drivers frustrated by traffic make risky lane changes and tailgate, and a truck caught in that churn has little ability to maneuver out of trouble. The combination of crowded roads and impatient drivers is a steady source of the crashes that keep the numbers climbing.

Vehicle Mismatch

None of these trends would matter as much if trucks and cars were evenly matched, but they are not. A loaded tractor-trailer can weigh twenty to thirty times what a passenger car weighs, and in a collision that mismatch determines who gets hurt. The same crash that dents two cars can be catastrophic when one of the vehicles is a heavy truck. The laws of physics do not negotiate, and no amount of caution by a car driver fully offsets a thirty-to-one weight difference.

Stopping distance

A loaded truck needs far more room to stop than a car, so a late reaction has bigger consequences.

Blind spots

Large areas around a truck where the driver cannot see a car create merge and lane-change crashes.

Underride risk

A car can slide under a trailer in a crash, a uniquely dangerous outcome the truck’s height creates.

Rollover and jackknife

A truck’s high center of gravity and articulated trailer add failure modes a car does not have.

The mismatch is why a truck crash so often produces life-changing injuries, and why the rules governing trucks are stricter than those for cars. The growth in truck traffic puts more of these mismatched encounters on the road every year. Each added truck is another vehicle that, in the wrong moment, can do far more damage to a family in a car than that family can do to it. That asymmetry is the reason a truck case is rarely a fender-bender and so often a serious-injury case.

Cargo Loading

How a truck is loaded affects how it behaves, and loading errors are a growing factor as the pace of freight quickens. A trailer loaded too heavy, loaded unevenly, or with cargo that was not properly secured handles differently and is harder to control. An overloaded truck takes longer to stop and is more prone to rollover, and shifting cargo can throw a trailer out of balance in a curve or a sudden maneuver. A load that breaks loose can also become its own hazard, spilling onto the road or striking other vehicles.

Federal rules govern cargo securement and weight limits, and the responsibility for a load often extends beyond the driver to the shipper and the company that loaded it. When a crash traces to a load that was too heavy or poorly secured, the case can include the parties who built the load and the person who drove it. Weigh-station records, bills of lading, and loading documents are part of what the investigation pulls, and they often reveal a load that never should have left the dock the way it did.

Pressure to move freight fast can mean less time spent securing a load correctly, which ties cargo problems back to the same scheduling pressure that drives so much of the trend. A driver rushed to leave a dock may not have the time, or may not be given the time, to load and secure the trailer the way the rules require.

Higher Stakes

For a person hurt in a truck crash, the upward trend is not an abstraction. It means the carrier on the other side is often a large company with practiced defense lawyers and adjusters who handle these claims every day. The same forces that drove the crash, volume, shortage, schedule pressure, also built an industry well-prepared to minimize what it pays. Large carriers often dispatch a rapid-response team to a serious crash scene within hours, gathering evidence and shaping the record before the injured person has left the hospital.

That is why the early investigation matters so much. Securing the electronic data, the logs, and the carrier’s safety record before they age out is what levels the field. The carrier already knows its own data; the injured person has to demand it, and demand it quickly, before routine practice puts it out of reach. The same framework drives every commercial vehicle case our firm handles, including the tractor-trailer and semi cases our Lexington office handles on Kentucky’s interstates, and other episodes in the Truck Talk series, including our look at truck driver shortages, walk through how that evidence gets used. The trend is the carrier’s advantage on paper, but a fast, disciplined investigation takes that advantage away.

Commercial Truck Litigation Counsel

Handling catastrophic commercial truck collisions requires thorough knowledge of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, digital evidence preservation requirements, and corporate motor carrier discovery practices. Jon Hollan and Sam Aguiar maintain selection in the Trucking Trial Lawyers Association Top 10, directing complex commercial vehicle investigations against national transportation carriers.

Under the Bigger Share Guarantee®, our clients always walk away with more money than the firm after medical bills, liens, and case expenses are paid. If a client’s share would ever be less than the legal fee, the firm cuts its fee. Every case receives a dedicated three-person team: a top-rated attorney, an experienced case manager, and a skilled legal assistant. We work under a flat contingency fee that never increases if your case goes to trial, with $0 out-of-pocket expenses forever.

Insurance companies push settlement releases quickly after a commercial wreck because an injury release is permanent. Once signed, the insurance claim is closed forever, leaving injured people to pay future medical expenses out of pocket. For a free case review, contact Sam Aguiar Injury Lawyers in Louisville at (502) 888-8888 or in Lexington at (859) 888-8000. Get more. Get it faster. Get it with Sam Aguiar.

Why Kentucky Chooses Sam Aguiar

Bigger Share Guarantee®
Forbes Best-In-State, 1 Of 16 In PI
Statewide Camera Database Access
$0 Out-Of-Pocket Forever
No Increased Charges For Litigation
1,000+ Five-Star Google Reviews